Non-reproducible results with MapleCOMSPS

I’ve been reading through the source code of the 2016 SAT Competition Main Track winner, MapleCOMSPS_DRUP, and I found that it has an important piece of code, regulating its behaviour that depends on timing:

static bool switch_mode = false;
static void SIGALRM_switch(int signum) { switch_mode = true; }

lbool Solver::solve_()
{
    signal(SIGALRM, SIGALRM_switch);
    alarm(2500);

Continue reading Non-reproducible results with MapleCOMSPS

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

I read this paper about most research findings being false. Given that most research papers in SAT take a sample size that is incredibly small (especially considering that it’s cheap to have large sample sizes relative to, e.g. medical trials), and the samples are very often hand-picked, it’s easy to see why this could be the case. But that article lists a number of other factors, too, and they are interesting to consider as well. Only few true innovations stick around in SAT (glues, VSIDS, UIP, restarts, etc). Most are forgotten because, frankly, they didn’t show the promise they purported to have. It’d be interesting to force authors to e.g. run their systems on much larger sample sizes (e.g. 2-3000 instances from SAT competitions) with much longer timeouts (e.g. 5000s). Then those implementing SAT solvers wouldn’t have to wade through piles of articles to get to something worth implementing. One is allowed to dream.

CryptoMiniSat 5.0.1 released — with MIT license

A new version of CryptoMiniSat, 5.0.1 has been released. It is essentially only a release to mark the move to a much more permissive, MIT license. I am changing the license so that everyone can use the system as they wish, however they wish. I want to give back to the community I have been part of for so long, and so I am making this change. Thank you all for using the solver, it makes me happy that I have been able to help some with my hobby work.

Texas Executed Offenders’ Last Words

An artist friend of mine gave me this idea, so here is the list of the most used words of those executed in Texas, from their last statement:

word       frequency
-----------------------
     you   4.670330
     and   3.945360
     the   3.670635
     for   2.701465
    love   2.419109 **
    that   2.190171
     all   2.113858
    have   1.663614
    this   1.297314
   thank   1.030220 **
    know   1.014957
  family   0.969170 **
    your   0.908120
     not   0.839438
    will   0.808913
     god   0.801282 **
    want   0.801282
   would   0.778388
    with   0.755495
     i'm   0.755495
   sorry   0.747863 **
    like   0.740232
     say   0.679182
     but   0.641026
    life   0.595238 **
    what   0.579976
   there   0.549451
   ya'll   0.534188
    hope   0.488400 **
    them   0.488400